File 031239
Lawrence Krauss Response to BuzzFeed Sexual Harassment Allegations (File 031239)
Email from physicist Lawrence Krauss responding to BuzzFeed News inquiries regarding allegations of sexual harassment, addressing specific claims and institutional investigations.
Summary
Lawrence Krauss drafts a detailed response to BuzzFeed News allegations of sexual harassment, defending his conduct and character. He addresses six specific allegations, denying misconduct and providing context for interactions with students and colleagues. Krauss references university investigations at Case Western Reserve University and Arizona State University that found no substantiation for claims, and emphasizes his professional standing and institutional support.
From: Lawrence KraussSent: 12/11/2017 5:53:12 AMTo: nancy dahl _____________________________________CC: Lawrence Krauss______________________________Subject: Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassmentAttachments: DA866543-7401-4A5A-8E50-FD32E33A5OEC.pngImportance: HighFirst draft:It is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statementson your part. Needless to say, I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentorstudents, colleagues, and members of the general public. I do not sexually harass people. If the purpose of yourreporting is to somehow argue that that Universities and other institutions are lax in dealing with well knownindividuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the opposite. My high public profile opens me up tomore scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens me up to a host of outside complaints andallegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which the University has to respond to. The fact that I haveremained a professor in all Universities with which I have been associated, in good standing, and also an officeror an invited speaker at organizations like CFI, which have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of thefact that they trust my behavior. I was asked to be an honorary director of CFI, and invited to their last 3meetings to speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees universallyappreciated my talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of yourreport is to impugn my integrity or suggest I have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one ofyour 'miscellaneous facts', as a scientist I try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather thanallegations and innuendo. I also try and judge the facts in context. The fact that Universities and otherorganizations employ me or have me on their boards, or invite me to meetings is because they value mycontributions and my actions.Your specific allegations are false or distorted. Item 1 refers to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in2006 where we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not beappropriate, and had respectful encounters afterwards. I cannot comment on item 3, which involves ananonymous 3rd party claim, because I know nothing about it, and it was not taken seriously enough to result inany university action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because I decided I didn't want to go out to abar with a group of attendees that I was harassing them? The second part is false. I don't do that. Re incident5: The 'female companion' in this case is my wife, who can attest to the fact that the claim is false, which iswhat I wrote in response to the blog in question, causing it to be taken down.It is worthwhile responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail,Re item 2: the student in question was interested in science communication, and on dozens of occasions cameto me or wrote to me with questions. When she asked about advice for after graduation I DID tell her she wasdifferent than the other students in her year. The rest of them were interested in going on to graduate school,but she was interested in science communication so I told her that she might want to take a different path. Sinceshe was the only woman in her year, as I recall, I did ask her on one of these occasions if that made it difficultfor her in any way. I asked, because as a faculty member I was interested, and also because as someone she hadasked for career advice from I wanted to know if that made a difference to her. Re asking her for dinner.. I havegone back over emails from that period. I have numerous requests from her to go for coffee to talk, which Iusually had to turn down because I was busy, including several occasions where she asked me to have coffeewith her off campus to talk, and I politely declined. I did let her accompany me off campus one time to watchme do a BBC interview because she specifically requested it. I did and do have coffee and meals with studentsHOUSE OVERSIGHT 031239on campus, and I see nothing wrong with this. I was shocked when I later learned of her complaint, not leastbecause there was no inappropriate interaction and also because well after the date on which she is said to havebeen offended, she continued to email me with joking questions or comments, and at a AAAS conference in2008, for which she had asked, and for which I had written her a letter of recommendation to attend, my wifeand I gave her a lift well out out of our way to drop her off at her hotel, and I note in an email response to heremail about the conference, agin in 2008, I expressed that I would pass her regards along to my wife and viceversa. When the University informed me of the complaint I was shocked and concerned. When I spoke tothe human resources person, including relating my concerns and providing the emails in question, I was toldthat no formal complaint of sexual harassment was deemed to be warranted in this case, and that the youngwoman in question had agreed to that. By that time I learned of the complaint I had already announced myintentions to leave Case to accept an offer at ASU—a very difficult decision for me because of my long-standing attachment to the University, and the excellent relations I had with my colleagues there, both amongthe faculty and among the administration. Because I was already in Arizona at the time I was asked not to haveany further interaction with the student I agreed to that request because it was basically moot. I was also toldthat because it was being handled informally, that (a) it should remain confidential, which I, at least abided by,and (b) if no further complaints were lodged in that case, that the University would remove the allegation frommy record after 5 years, which makes me surprised that someone violated that written agreement with you.Re item 6: You report on ASU's response to item #6 , without including the fact that the University specificallystated there were never any allegations of sexual misconduct or harassment by me at the University, and theoutside complaints were in fact related specifically to your item #6. Further you neglect to mention that thiscomplaint was by an anonymous third party, not the individual who was allegedly harassed, who never lodged acomplain, and that no specific evidence was provided of the alleged transgression. I was surprised anddismayed that both ASU and ANU launched investigations on the basis of this but was told by both Universitiesthat because of my high profile even such unsubstantiated third party complaints at private events unrelated tothe University would be investigated. The complaint was investigated throughly by both ASU and ANU andboth came to the conclusion that it was not credible and no university policies had been violated. . In additionANU's investigation, which took a full month found significant inconsistencies in the allegation, suggestingdistortion and fabrication, I will quote from the ANU report. The initial complaint, which in fact resulted in atemporary suspension by ANU outlined the claim you made in the words you quoted in your note to me, alongwith the statement made in the complaint that"It is the University's understanding that a complaint was lodged directly to the conference organisers at thetime of the incident."After the investigation, the final report absolved me of any wrongdoing, and indicated information inconsistentwith the original claim and apparent later claims as follows:"The allegations were made by an observer to the incident.- The complaint did not identify, nor disclose the identity of the conference attendee who was allegedly touchedinan unwelcome manner.- The conference attendee who took the `selfie' photo did not lodge a formal complaint to the conferenceorganisersat the time of the incident (November 2016).- The conference attendee who witnessed the incident, did not lodge a formal complaint to the conferenceorganisersat the time of the incident (November 2016).The photo submitted as part of the complaint does not provide evidence of any physical contact.- The complainant alleged that a photo exists, showing your hand on the breast of the conference attendee whotookHOUSE OVERSIGHT 031240the `selfie' photo. This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it wasrequestedin the course of the investigation."(And for the record I often put my hand up in front of a camera if there is a flash, as I specifically request selfiesnot to include flashes, so that I don't end up with a series bright spots in front of my eyes for the next half hour)What makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that I get asked for literally thousands of selfies,and when people come up to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, and sometimes overly aggressive. I amparticularly proud of the way I attempt to make all people feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated.Thus, this false claim strikes at the heart of what I am about, which is to acknowledge fans in a way that makesthem feel appreciated. As I understand you had a reporter watching me sign books and take selfies at the CFIconference in Las Vegas this year, that behavior is what they will have witnessed. Moreover, I am proud of theinteractions I have had at both Case and ASU, with students, colleagues and staff. I have had numerous femalegraduate students, postdocs, employees, and colleagues, and as ASU attested to you, none of these have evercomplained of harassment. Quite the contrary in fact, as I have worked hard to support them, mentor them, andtreat them with respect. I treat others as responsible adults, and I expect to be treated equally.Lawrence M. KraussDirector, The Origins Project at ASUCo-Director, Cosmology InitiativeFoundation ProfessorSchool of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics DepartmentArizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404Research Office: , AssistantOrigins Officeorigins.asu.edu I twitter.com/Ikraussl I krauss.faculty.asu.eduMU OriginsARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITYBegin forwarded message:From: Peter AldhousSubject: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassmentDate: December 10, 2017 at 5:12:27 PM PSTTo:Dr. Krauss:As you know, I'm a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegationsagainst you. As we've already discussed by email, I'd very much like to interview you about these allegations indetail.In particular, you stated in an email sent on Nov 13 that two universities had investigated an incident (# 6below). You claimed that "both Universities independently concluded that the report was unsubstantiated andfabricated with malicious intent." We are not aware that either university concluded fabrication or maliciousintent, so if you have evidence to support this assertion, we would like to see and discuss it.HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031241The story concerns your actions towards students while a professor of physics at Case Western ReserveUniversity, as well as your conduct in non-academic settings as a prominent figure in the skeptics movement. Iam reporting this story along with two of my colleagues on the science desk, Azeen Ghorayshi and VirginiaHughes.Our story is about several allegations of sexual misconduct dating from 2006 to 2016 (see full details below).Our reporting also goes into how the various institutions you have been affiliated with — Case Western,Arizona State University, the Australian National University, the New College of the Humanities, and the Centerfor Inquiry, for which you serve as an honorary member of the board of directors — have handled complaintsand concerns about your behavior during this time.Our story is corroborated by emails, university documents, official complaints, testimony from victims andeyewitnesses, and interviews with more than two dozen of your current and former academic colleagues,students, and peers in the skeptics movement.I wanted to offer you the opportunity to comment and/or respond to the main facts we plan to publish. If youwish to comment on any of the below findings, we need to hear from you as soon as possible. We areplanning on publishing our story Tuesday morning, Eastern US Time.Based on our reporting, this is what we plan to publish:Incident 1:• In November of 2006, at an event launching the new Center for Inquiry in Washington D.C., you met avolunteer for CFI D.C.• At the event, you asked for her business card. Later, you followed her as she was leaving and askedher if she was "of age."• Later, you emailed her to invite her to dinner.• You planned to dine with her in the restaurant at the Washington D.C. hotel where you were staying.• You told her to come up to your room first because you needed to finish some work.• In your hotel room, you seemed in no rush to leave. You ordered a cheese plate, and later champagne,despite her suggestion that you go down to dinner.• You then made a comment about her eye makeup, getting very close to her face.• You then lifted her by her arms, and pushed her onto the bed beneath you, forcibly kissing her andtrying to pull down the crotch of her tights.• She struggled to push you off her.• You said, "When I was in college I could never get a girl that looked like you."• When you pulled out a condom, she got out from under you. She said "I have to go," and rushed out ofthe room.Incident 2:• In an incident that occurred in fall of 2007 while you were a physics professor at Case Western ReserveUniversity, a student tried to talk to you about her plans after graduation. You mentioned to her how tough itmust be to have all the other physics majors asking her out on dates.• In a second incident in December of 2007, while you were still at Case Western, the same studentvisited your office to interview you for a student science journal. You closed the door behind her, and ignoredthe questions she had prepared. Then you made a casual comment about taking her out for dinner.• Later, in a regular column for the school paper, she described her experiences with you, withoutmentioning you by name. "There was even one particular creep of a professor who once told me he thoughtdifferently of me compared to other students and asked me to dinner: a situation so disturbing that it left meupset for weeks afterward," she wrote.HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031242• She was then approached by a dean at the university, who suspected that she was referring to you,based on a previously reported incident with another student. He encouraged her to make a complaint, andshe did.• University investigators interviewed both you and the student.• On September 4, 2008, Susan Nickel-Schindewolf, the university's associate vice president for studentaffairs, wrote to the student, telling her that the investigation was complete. She wrote that you had been told:"This type of behavior could constitute sexual harassment in violation of the university's sexual harassmentpolicy.• The letter also stated that you were prohibited from making contact with the student as long as sheremained at Case.11• The letter also stated that you are required to get approval from the dean or the chair of the physicsdepartment before setting foot on the campus again.• The letter also stated, "Dr. Krauss expressed regret about having a negative impact on you, and alsohis willingness to use this complaint as an opportunity to reflect and improve on his future interactions withstudents."• By then, you had already left Case, taking up your current position at Arizona State University themonth before.• "The opportunities being offered at ASU are simply too great to turn down at this stage in my career,"you told Case colleagues, in an email announcing your departure on April 16, 2008.Incident 3:• A former Case Western physics department administrator confirmed that she had reported a previousincident involving a student who had confided in her about your inappropriate behavior towards her.Incident 4:• You met a student from another university, an atheist activist, in March 2008 at the American AtheistsConvention in Minneapolis. She wanted to expand the atheist group she ran at the midwestern university shewas attending, and hoped to convince you to come and speak. You initially seemed enthusiastic.• During the convention, attendees including you and Richard Dawkins went for dinner with the studentand volunteers for Dawkins' foundation.• Afterwards, the student invited you to join the volunteers for a drink.• You asked her to come get you in your hotel room. She was wary of your intentions, and so brought amale friend with her. Opening the door to find them both there, you informed her you had decided not to go.• You met this student again at the American Atheists Convention in Des Moines, Iowa, in April 2011.•table.You pulled over a chair for her in the bar, and then started running your hand up her leg under the• She tried to shift her body away from you, and you persisted in putting your hand on her leg. Shecrossed her legs, and you kept trying. Then she turned her entire body away.Incident 5:• This incident allegedly occurred on in May 2011 on a CFI cruise. We understand that CFI staff wereinformed that you had propositioned a female cruise-goer, who rejected an invitation to join you and yourfemale companion for sex in your cabin.• At least two CFI staffers were sufficiently concerned about reports of your behavior that they urgedCFI's president not to invite you on a 2014 cruise of the Galapagos Islands. You were invited on that cruise,however.Incident 6:HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031243• During a visit to Melbourne, Australia, in November 2016, you were accused of sexual misconduct onceagain.• The incident happened at a dinner held at the Melbourne Zoo as part of the Australian SkepticsNational Convention, where you were a featured speaker.• With conference delegates chatting over drinks, a woman asked you for a celebrity selfie.• As the woman held out her phone to take the picture, you reached over her shoulder and grabbed herright breast.• She immediately reacted, bodychecking you and spinning around. "Don't do that," she said.• BuzzFeed News has seen the complaint made by another woman to ASU, ANU, and the New Collegeof the Humanities in London, including the selfie, her face obscured to conceal her identity. It shows your handin motion as a blur in front of her shoulder, apparently moving toward her chest. Two other eyewitnesses haveconfirmed the complainant's account of what happened.• In April 2017, the complainant described the incident on her blog. After hearing more about yourreputation for inappropriate behavior from blog readers, she decided to file a complaint about the Nov. 2016incident.• On July 16, she filed formal complaints with Arizona State University, and with the Australian NationalUniversity in Canberra and the New College of the Humanities in London, where you have visitingappointments.• Both Arizona State and the Australian National University told her they would look into the matter. Butneither university found against you.• "Based on the material available to the University, we do not have sufficient evidence to substantiatethe allegations," Kiaran Kirk, dean of the College of Science at the Australian National University, wrote to her.• Erin Ellison, who heads Arizona State's Office of Equity & Inclusion, wrote to her explaining that aninquiry "did not find a violation of university policy."• In October, Arizona State denied a request from BuzzFeed News for documents relating to complaintsof sexual harassment against you. However, Cynthia Jewett, the university's senior associate general counsel,noted that two individuals, neither affiliated with the university, had complained about you. "The University didnot find either communication to state a credible allegation," Jewett wrote.Miscellaneous facts:• In 2008, you founded the Origins Project at Arizona State University in Tempe, a multidisciplinary effortto understand the origins of the universe, life, and social systems. You have led that effort ever since.• Thanks to best-selling books like The Physics of Star Trek and A Universe From Nothing, frequentessays in publications including the New Yorker and the New York Times, and the documentary you made withbiologist Richard Dawkins, called The Unbelievers, you are celebrated as one of America's leading publicintellectuals.• You served on the science policy committee for Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign and are avocal critic of President Donald Trump.• You also make regular public appearances across the world, often at gatherings of skeptics andatheists.• At CSICon in Las Vegas in October, a few dozen fans paid $500 per head to attend a VIP luncheonwith you and Dawkins.• Many more lined up to get you to sign their copy of your latest book, The Greatest Story Ever Told —So Far.• Online, people can buy T-shirts emblazoned "Lawrence Krauss for President."• In talks and interviews, you have argued that our universe arose without divine intervention, thatreligion drives xenophobia, and that our brains are hardwired to believe.HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031244• You have stated that science provides answers to many of life's biggest questions, and can even fixgreat societal injustices.• Earlier this year, at a Q&A event to promote your new book, the conversation came around to thedearth of women and minorities in science. "Science itself overcomes misogyny and prejudice and bias," yousaid. "It's built in: Questioning yourself, always questioning results, questioning others, relying on empiricalevidence."• You have clashed with some skeptics over your defense of Jeffrey Epstein, a billionaire financier who in2008 was convicted for soliciting prostitution from underage girls, and spent 13 months in a Florida jail.• Through his private foundation, Epstein has funded the work of several prominent scientists. He hasprovided funding for your Origins Project, supporting lectureship and scholarship programs, most recentlypledging $100,000 in 2014.• In April 2011, you told the Daily Beast: "As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence andhe always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, mypresumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people."• In a blog comment about the Epstein controversy, you wrote: "I remain skeptical, and I support a manwhose character I believe I know.. .If you want to condemn me for that, so be it."• You were made an honorary member of CFI's board of directors in December 2011.• A blog post published in August 2013 described incidents #1 and #4, naming you. Another post,published at around the same time, described incident #5.• The first post was edited to remove your name after you had commented that the allegations of assaultwere "potentially illegal." The second post was quickly taken down.Again, if you wish to comment on or clarify any of these points, please get in touch with us as soon as possible.If I do not respond immediately it is because I am on another call, so please leave the best phone number toreach you.Thanks,Peter AldhousPeter Aldhous, PhDScience reporter I BuzzFeed Newstel:cell:@paldhouswww.peteraldhous.cornHOUSE OVERSIGHT 031245