File 029901
John Brockman Edge Question 2011 Invitation to Jeffrey Epstein (File 029901)
Email invitation from Edge editor John Brockman to Jeffrey Epstein for the 2011 Edge Question annual intellectual forum, with editorial guidelines and list of confirmed intellectual contributors.
Summary
John Brockman sends an invitation to Jeffrey Epstein on December 31, 2010, inviting him to contribute to the 2011 Edge Question annual intellectual forum. The theme asks prominent thinkers to answer: 'What scientific concept would improve everybody's cognitive toolkit?' The email includes the submission deadline (January 12, 2011), editorial guidelines emphasizing original thought and intellectual rigor, and lists prominent contributors including Steven Pinker, Daniel Kahneman, and numerous other leading intellectuals. The document contains extensive press coverage praising Edge's previous questions.
From: John Brockman ________________________Sent: 12/31/2010 6:23:47 PMTo: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]Subject: Edge Question 2011 - An InvitationImportance: High"Deliciously creative.., the variety astonishes...intellectual skyrockets of stunning brilliance. Nobodyin the world is doing what Edge is doing." Denis Dutton, ARTS & LETTERS DAILYTHE WORLD QUESTION CENTERJames Flynn has defined "shorthand abstractions" (or "sHA's") as concepts drawn from science that havebecome part of the language and make people smarter by providing widely applicable templates ("market","placebo", "random sample," "naturalistic fallacy," are a few of his examples). His idea is that theabstraction is available as a single cognitive chunk which can be used as an element in thinking anddebate.The Edge Question 2011WHAT SCIENTIFIC CONCEPT WOULD IMPROVE EVERYBODY'S COGNITIVE TOOLKIT?The term 'scientific"is to be understood in a broad sense as the most reliable way of gaining knowledgeabout anything, whether it be the human spirit, the role of great people in history, or the structure ofDNA. A "scientific concept" may come from philosophy, logic, economics, jurisprudence, or other analyticenterprises, as long as it is a rigorous conceptual tool that may be summed up succinctly (or "in aphrase") but has broad application to understanding the world.[Thanks to Steven Pinker for suggesting this year's EDGE Question and to Daniel Kahneman for advice onits presentation.]In MemoriamDENIS DUTTON1944-2010Last year, the 2010 EDGE Question, "How Is The Internet Changing The Way You Think?"(http://www.edge.org/q2010/q10_index.html), generated 172 essays (132,000 words) and received globalpress attention.To date, the following have already responded to the 2011 EDGE Question: Clifford Pickover, RudyRucker,sean Carroll, Gino Segre, Jason Zweig, Dylan Evans, Steven Pinker, martin Seligman, Gerald Holton,Robert Provine, Nassim N. Taleb, Roger schank, George Dyson, Milford wolpoff, George Lakoff, W. DanielHiliis, Nicholas Humphrey,christian Keysers, Haim Harari, John Allen Paulos, Bruce Hood, Howard Gardner.PERMALINK: http://www.edge.org/q2011/q1l_index.htmluser id: edgepassword: q2011(all lower case — password-protected until publication)SUBMITTING ESSAYS: Email as text or attached word file to me.DUE DATE: 8pm, Wednesday, January 12thPUBLICATION DATE: Midnight, Thursday, January 13thPRESS EMBARGO: until publication. Do not cite or circulate.EDITORIAL MARCHING ORDERSSay something new, true, and interesting, based on your own experience, in 1,000 words or less. Emailcontributions to me.HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029901As usual, no politics ("Democrat" "Republican") or politicians ("Obama" "Bush" "Clinton" "Pali n', etc.),editorials, opeds, opinion pieces, flippancy. No ad hominem comments. No self-promotion: referencing yourbooks, papers, courses, "selling from the stage", pushing your well-known agenda. No footnotes orhyperlink: stay on the page. No anecdotes about spouses, significant others, kids, family pets. Write astand-alone piece: don't respond to the pieces of other contributors already posted.Go deeper than the news. Tell me something I don't know. This is not a purely scientific question: thisis question about our culture and ourselves. The ideas we present on Edge can offer readers and the widerpublic a new set of metaphors to describe ourselves, our minds, the way we think, the world, and all ofthe things we know in it.Be imaginative, exciting, compelling, inspiring. Tell a great story. Make an argument that makes adifference. Amaze and delight. Surprise us!I look forward to hearing from you. Happy New Year!Sincerely,John BrockmanEditor & PublisherThe EDGE Question in the News:"Deliciously creative.., the variety astonishes...intellectual skyrockets of stunning brilliance. Nobodyin the world is doing what Edge is doing." ARTS & LETTERS • "Fantastically stimulating... It's like thecrack cocaine of the thinking world.... Once you start, you can't stop thinking about that question." BBCRADIO 4 • "Big, deep and ambitious questions... breathtaking in scope." NEW SCIENTIST • "A stellar castof intellectuals ... a stunning array of responses."NEW SCIENTIST • Brilliant ... captivating ...overwhelming."SEED • "Bold, often thrilling, sometimes chilling, answers." NEWS-OBSERVER • "Thefascinating breadth of their visions of the future is revealed today by the discussion website edge.com,which has asked some of the world's finest mind the question: 'What will change everything?'" THE TIMES• "Edge: brilliant, essential and addictive. The result of this ambitious venture, for those who havealready experienced navigating the web pages of edge.org, is not only brilliant, but addictive. Itinterprets, it interrogates, it provokes. Each text can be a world in itself." PUBLICO (LISBON) --COVERSTORY, SUNDAY MAGAZINE • "The world's finest minds have responded with some of the most insightful,humbling, fascinating confessions and anecdotes, an intellectual treasure trove. ... Best three or fourhours of intense, enlightening reading you can do for the new year. Read it now." SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE• "The splendidly enlightened Edge website (www.edge.org) has rounded off each year of inter-disciplinarydebate by asking its heavy-hitting contributors to answer one question. I strongly recommend a visit."THE INDEPENDENT • "A great event in the Anglo-Saxon culture." EL MUNDO • "As fascinating and weighty asone would imagine." THE INDEPENDENT • "They are the intellectual elite, the brains the rest of us rely onto make sense of the universe and answer the big questions. But in a refreshing show of new yearhumility, the world's best thinkers have admitted that from time to time even they are forced to changetheir minds." THE GUARDIAN • "Praised by everyone from the Guardian, Prospect magazine, Wired, the NewYork Times and BBC Radio 4, Edge is an online collective of deep thinkers. Their contributors aren't onthe frontier, they are the frontier." THE SCOTSMAN • "A selection of the most explosive ideas of ourage." SUNDAY HERALD • "Uplifting ...enthralling." MAIL ON SUNDAY • "If you think the web is full oftrivial rubbish, you will find the intellectual badinage of edge.org to be a blessed counterpoint." THETIMES • "...fascinating and provocative reading." -- THE GUARDIAN • "...reads like an intriguing dinnerparty conversation among great minds in science." -- DISCOVER • "Fantastically stimulating... It's likethe crack cocaine of the thinking world.... Once you start, you can't stop thinking about that question."BBC RADIO 4 • "Danger -- brilliant minds at work... exhilarating, hilarious, and chilling." EVENINGSTANDARD • "Wonderful reading." THE TIMES • "Strangley addictive."THE TELEGRAPH • "The greatest virtualresearch university in the world." ARTS & LETTERS DAILY • "Audacious and stimulating." LA VANGUARDIA •"Brilliant! Stimulating reading for anyone seeking a glimpse into the next decade." THE SUNDAY TIMES • "Arunning fire of a provocative and fascinating thesis." LA STAMPA##HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029902