File 029176
CNN Interview on US-China Tariffs and Trade War with Robert Lawrence Kuhn (File 029176)
CNN interview from August 2, 2018 featuring China policy expert Robert Lawrence Kuhn discussing the Trump administration's tariff strategy, Chinese economic concerns, and intellectual property disputes.
Summary
CNN host interviews Robert Lawrence Kuhn, a longtime advisor to Chinese leaders, about the implications of Trump's tariffs on China. The discussion covers China's perspective on the trade war, the impact on American consumers and industries, and broader policy issues including intellectual property protection, market access, and technology transfer. Kuhn explains why Chinese officials believe the U.S. cannot win a trade war, citing American domestic political divisions, consumer impact, and industry opposition to tariffs.
CNN TODAYUS-China Tariffs, Trade WarRobert Lawrence Kuhn, August 2, 2018Host: To talk about the potential impact [oftariffs]…. Robert Lawrence Kuhn is a long-timeadvisor to China’s leaders and the Chinesegovernment. He is also the author of HowChina’s Leaders Think. You are the perfectperson to have on to get China’s perspective.Thank you so much for joining us.RLK: A Pleasure.Host: So Trump is obviously hoping for somekind of trade deal, but is this going to work?Tariffs to get Chinese officials to the table?RLK: Certainly from China’s point of view, theywere very happy with the status quo before thisoccurred. They blame the U.S. for starting atrade war. They think the U.S. will suffer and,indeed in a trade war, everybody suffers. Thereare some serious problems, though, thatAmerican experts, American government[policies], reflect. Very few people in the U.S.actually support the tariffs themselves. Therewill be higher prices for consumers. There willbe more people affected – [there are] moreindustries that use steel than produce steel.1RLK: So there’s a significant impact [on theUS]. The US hope is that China will bepressured to make changes in its policy. Nowthe [tariff] policy is not just [targeting] thetrade deficit. The policies are, what are called,China’s closed market, intellectual propertyprotection, industrial espionage, tech transfersand JVs (to get the Chinese market) andgovernment support for tech. And for each ofthese, China has responses. China says it wasdoing what was appropriate under the WTObecause it was a developing country. Now thatit’s advanced, it’s opening markets.China has a “negative list” telling people[companies] what it cannot do, making it mucheasier; China is also opening further in autosand financial services. But they need to bepushed more. Even economists in Chinarecognize that, that coming out of this, if wehave cool heads and smart brains, both sidescan be better off.HOST: So are there other ways to do this? Youlisted that Trump wants to close a trade deficit.He’s hitting back at these closed markets. Hewants to prevent the stealing of intellectualproperty. What is an effective way to do thisbesides heaping these tariffs on China?2RLK: Well some people would say that tariffshave at least got China’s attention. Even someleading people tell me privately in China that inthat sense China needs to move faster in doingthings like opening markets, like intellectualproperty protection. Now they are doing somethings. They have an intellectual propertycourt. I visited it in Shanghai a few monthsago. It’s working really well. Much moreprogress needs to be done. So in that sense thetariffs are a beacon that tells everybody weneed to deal because everybody is going tosuffer by tariffs. The question is how we dealwith it.China needs to make some specific changesregarding markets, IPR, some of these otherthings — they should be done subtlety and notpublicly. That’s the way to get things done.HOST: I see. You know, President Trump hasinfamously said that trade wars are good andthey’re easy to win. And you wrote about this,why the Chinese don’t think that the U.S. couldever win a trade war with Beijing. It was avery long list but tell us the highlights of that.RLK: Right — in the early days of the so-calledtrade war, the Chinese media and Chineseexperts were talking very frequently about howthe U.S. can’t win.3Examples were the U.S. is divided on tariffswhich is certainly true. China is not becausepublicly people don’t speak against the Chinesegovernment, so that may be a little bitartificial, but nonetheless it is a matter of publicpolicy in China to support the government.There’s a nationalistic pride in China.Americans will be affected by their pocketbook. They’re going to pay more for baseballgloves and television sets and dishwashers.And people are not going to be happy aboutthat. There will be industries that will beaffected — and technology and soybeans weknow. So there will be many, many interestgroups in the U.S. that will argue and fightagainst tariffs.So the basic reason is that the U.S. has adivided approach to tariffs, and that’s certainlytrue. Most experts deny that tariffs are aneffective way. Quiet diplomacy, puttingpressure on China in the right way is the waybecause China does need to make somechanges. People in China recognize that.HOST: As China is saying they will not beblackmailed to doing these things. We’re goingto have to leave it there. Robert LawrenceKuhn, we appreciate your expertise. Thank youvery much for your time.RLK: Thank you.4