File 027099
Email Chain on US-Israeli Relations and Iran Nuclear Policy (File 027099)
Email correspondence from Jeffrey Epstein forwarding an analysis by Ephraim Sneh regarding US-Israeli tensions over Iran's nuclear program and proposals for diplomatic resolution, dated August 2012.
Summary
Jeffrey Epstein forwards an op-ed by Ephraim Sneh, a retired Israeli Defense Minister, to Sultan Bin Sulayem discussing the deteriorating US-Israeli relationship over Iran's nuclear threat. Sneh's analysis presents eight key facts explaining Israeli concerns about a nuclear Iran and proposes a four-point mutual commitment package between the US and Israel, including Israel's commitment to refrain from attacking Iran in 2012, joint intelligence assessments in spring 2013, US support for Israeli military independence, and Israeli participation in peace negotiations on the Palestinian conflict.
From: Jeffrey Epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com]Sent: 8/27/2012 11:05:23 AMTo: Sultan Bin SulayerrSubject: Re: How to Repair the Widening American-Israeli Rifthttp://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5j00NtuA2fbH1hED38qZkrNKc6VJw?docId=CNG.158e059567cc64e99373df644f3134b3.01On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Sultan Bin Sulayem ,I1=1> wrote:Begin forwarded message:From: Esneh <Date: August 27, 2012 9:23:47 AM GMT+01:00To: 'Esneh'Subject: How to Repair the Widening American-Israeli RiftIsrael Policy ForumOn Iran: How to Repair the Widening American-Israeli RiftEphraim SnehThe Islamist takeover in the Middle East and North Africa has created perilous strategicturbulence in the region. Consequently, it is now critically important that the United States andits few allies cooperate closely. Unfortunately, this has not been the case in recent weeks for US-Israel relations regarding Iran's nuclear program. The disagreement about attacking Iran'snuclear facilities has turned into ugly bickering, much of it disguised. This is harmful for bothIsrael and the United States.To heal this rift — which is necessary to effectively address the Iranian threat — we mustunderstand the following basic facts:1. The Israeli fear of a nuclear Iran is genuine. It is not a political trick of Prime MinisterBenjamin Netanyahu or Defense Minister Ehud Barak. A nuclear Iran would bolster andencourage extremist militant forces across the region. The moderates would be discouraged,intimidated and invariably weakened to the point where they would be unable to negotiate withIsrael. In just a few years, Israel will be surrounded by three Pakistan-like' countries: SaudiArabia, Egypt and Turkey. All three would possess nuclear weapons and be dominatedpolitically by Islamists. In such a scenario, Israel would lose its strategic advantage in the region.It would lose its lead as a country of entrepreneurship and excellence, as foreign investmentwould decline and talented young Israelis would build their future abroad. No responsible IsraeliHOUSE OVERSIGHT 027099leader will allow such a nightmare to become a reality. The hateful declarations of Iran's leaders,committed to wiping the Jewish state off the map, do not assuage Israelis' fears.2. Economic sanctions cannot convince the regime in Teheran to abandon its nuclear project.However, sanctions can bring about the collapse of the regime if they are vigorouslyimplemented and enforced.3. An American military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities would be more effectivethan an Israeli one. But disparaging Israel's capabilities and its military ingenuity, underminingits deterrence effect, is a grave mistake.4. Israel's operational window is closing. If Israel has to cope alone with the Iranian threat, itswindow of operational opportunity is narrower than the American one. It has to act sooner.5. An Israeli military strike in the next two months, contravening repeated demands by theU.S. President to postpone it, would be counterproductive. The damage of defying thePresident would be greater than the damage sustained by allowing the Iranian regime anadditional few months of advancing toward acquiring the bomb. Such a strike may broaden thegap between the U.S. and Israel and weaken the alliance, which all previous Israeli Prime-Ministers have safeguarded as a strategic asset of Israel.6. The United States has failed to prevent countries like Pakistan or North Korea fromobtaining nuclear weapons. This record feeds Israeli skepticism about a U.S. success in thecase of Iran. This skepticism prevails despite the clear rhetoric and unquestionable commitmentsof the President and the Secretaries of State and Defense to prevent a nuclear Iran.7. The fact that the Israeli Prime Minister and the Republican presidential candidate sharethe same political benefactor feeds suspicions in the Obama administration about Netanyahu'smotives for attacking Iran a few weeks before the U.S. presidential elections.8. The regional perspective cannot continue ignoring the unresolved Israeli-Palestinianconflict. This issue can no longer be swept under the rug. Maintaining the status quo is politicallycomfortable in the short-run, but it will be combustible and devastating in the long run.Achieving the two-state solution will preserve Israel as a Jewish, democratic state. It will endIsrael's regional isolation. It will rebuild America's standing and influence in the Arab andMuslim world. Furthermore, these last two outcomes will strengthen America's and Israel'shands in thwarting Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions.These eight basic facts combine to produce a complex reality. When fully understood, they canpave the way to restoring U.S.-Israeli harmony. There is no symmetry between the United States,the super-power, and its tiny ally, Israel. But the "package" required from each side in order tomend fences has to include the following mutual commitments:1. Israel will not attack Iran in 2012.2. The United States will hold a joint intelligence estimate session with Israel in the early springof 2013. If the conclusion of this joint estimate is that there is no substantial slow-down of theIranian nuclear project, the U.S. will take military action to destroy this project.3. The United States will oppose any attempt to intervene in Israel's strategic capacities and willprevent any monitoring of Israel's own strategic installations. At the same time, the United StatesHOUSE OVERSIGHT 027100will uncompromisingly support Israel's right to preserve and develop its indigenous militarycapacities.4. Israel will accept an American invitation to attend a peace conference that will be convenedin the U.S. no later than mid-2013. This gathering will address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,aiming to resolve it once and for all with an agreed-upon timetable for implementation.These four commitments would serve the interests of both the United States and Israel. Theywould enable the U.S. to resume its leadership role of peacemaking in the Middle East. And theywould provide a basis for binding the U.S. and Israel together as they face these challengingtimes.Ephraim Sneh, a retired IDF General, served as Israel's deputy minister of defense. He iscurrently and Israel Policy Forum contributing fellow and chairman of S. Daniel AbrahamCenter for Strategic Dialogue at the Netanya Academic College.NOTE: This e-mail message is subject to the Dubai World Group disclaimer see http://www.dubaiworld.ae/email disclaimer***********************************************************The information contained in this communication isconfidential, may be attorney-client privileged, mayconstitute inside information, and is intended only forthe use of the addressee. It is the property ofJeffrey EpsteinUnauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thiscommunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibitedand may be unlawful. If you have received thiscommunication in error, please notify us immediately byreturn e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, anddestroy this communication and all copies thereof,including all attachments. copyright -all rights reservedHOUSE OVERSIGHT 027101