File 023707
CNN Quest Means Business - U.S. and China Trade War Pause Discussion with Robert Lawrence Kuhn (File 023707)
CNN interview between host Richard Quest and China expert Robert Lawrence Kuhn discussing the U.S.-China trade war pause and 90-day negotiation period agreed to in December 2018.
Summary
Richard Quest interviews Robert Lawrence Kuhn, a longtime advisor to Chinese leaders, about the implications of the U.S.-China trade pause agreed to on Friday, December 2018. Kuhn explains China's perspective within the context of its 40th anniversary of reform and opening up, and President Xi's goal to eliminate extreme poverty by 2020. The discussion covers differing interpretations of the deal between the two countries, the role of domestic political messaging, and whether structural economic changes will occur beyond surface-level agricultural purchases and tariff adjustments. Kuhn notes that while both sides present different narratives to their domestic audiences, private discussions may yield more substantive progress on core issues like IP protection and market opening.
CNN – Quest Means BusinessU.S. and China Agree to Pause Trade WarRobert Lawrence Kuhn, December 3, 20181HostRichard Quest:Robert LawrenceKuhn is a longtimeadvisor toChinese leadersand the author ofHow China’sLeaders Think.How will they beinterpreting thedeal that was doneon Friday?2Robert Lawrence Kuhn / RLK:Everybody is pleased that there isthe pause; 90 days is very short,of course. We have to look at theshort-term, mid-term, and longterm.Let’s look at thebackground to understand whereChina is today. This is the 40 thyear, the anniversary, of China’sreform and opening up. OnDecember 18 th , 1978, DengXiaoping made his famousspeech, which transformed Chinafrom ideologically driven classstruggle into economicdevelopment. It’s a big deal inChina; there’s a big celebrationcoming up.RLK: President Xi Jinping has saidthat the first big goal for China, in2020, is to have a moderatelyprosperous society, specifically toeliminate all extreme poverty inChina. That means they will havetaken 800 million people out ofpoverty. So that’s their overview,and so they look at the status quothat they’ve had with America assomething that’s good for bothsides.3RLK: As for America, we havecritical issues that we have todeal with: Open markets, IPprotection, forced technologytransfer, cyber security / cybertheft — there are a lot of issueson the table.Quest: The two sides are seeingFriday’s deal in very differentways.RLK: That always happens —Quest: But the Chinese —RLK: That’s diplomacy. That’s thedefinition — we saw that in thespy plane collision in 2001; wesaw that in the bombing of theYugoslavian embassy in 1999.4RLK: Both sides haddifferentinterpretations to suittheir domesticmarkets.Quest: But they’re noteven admitting, or atleast acknowledging,a 90 days. Let aloneall this business of,“we’re going to buymore cars.”RLK: Well, look. InChina, there is adebate amongChinese economists,what’s good forChina? Manyeconomists tell meprivately, personally,one-on-one, like I’mtalking to you rightnow, that Chinaneeds to open itsmarkets, it needs tohave IP protection, itshouldn’t supportstate-ownedenterprises as much.But they haveinternal debate.5RLK: Those Chineseeconomists are pleased tosee this pressure going on,but China cannot admitthat publicly, because thatundermines therejuvenation of China, thestrength of thegovernment, the nationalpride.RLK: We have tounderstand both sides arespeaking to their domesticaudiences, but hopefully,when they get togetherprivately, they’ll talkbusiness.6Quest: Do you believe thatthey can and or will makethe structural changesnecessary to get a longtermdeal, because it seemsas if President Trump is notgoing to be satisfied longtermwith agreeing to buy afew extra bits of this orthat of agriculture.RLK: I totally agree withthat, and I think that’sright. We’re going to haveto see. I mean, it’s easy topredict 10 years in thefuture, but not 10 days. Sowe’ll see where we go.7RLK: But the people inChina whom I talk with saythey recognize that thistime is different. And whatthey’re going to do isthey’re going to focus onthe changes that theybelieve are good for China.You actually saw that insome of theannouncements today.We’re going to do the kindsof things that help ourdomestic economy as well.That sounds like it’s a playfor their own domesticaudiences — to showthey’re not conceding — butin fact it is really the case.8Quest: The U.S.president talkedabout sellinglarge amounts ofagriculture to theChinese, andtariffs onautomobilesdown from 40%maybe to 0%.This ismercantilist stuff.This isn’t “tradedeal.”RLK: Totallyagree with that.And those aresuperficial things,they makeheadlines, they’reeasy tounderstand, butthey’re not thesubstance ofwhat’s happeninghere.9Quest: Do youbelieve thatthere’s a shift inperspective in this,this dinner shiftedthings?RLK: I believethere has been ashift; I wouldn’ttell you the dinnerdid it, but overtime, there isrecognition thatthis time isdifferent.Quest: Thank you,sir. Next time,when it’s different,you’ll come backand tell us.RLK: Absolutely.Quest: Okay, good.Good to see you;thank you.10