File 015002

Images

Text

From: Weingarten, Reid _____________________________________
Sent: 7/4/2017 4:46:06 PM
To: jeevacation@gmail.com
Subject: Fw: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell
Importance: High
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From:
Sent: Saturday, July 1, 2017 12:49 PM
To:
Cc: Ainbanklaw Info;
; Patrick M. Regan;
Denyse Sabagh;
Michael Baxter;
Robert Barnett; Weingarten, Reid;
Ellen Kerns;
Subject: Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell
We know of course that Saturdays are reserved for Matthew Horton.
On Saturday, July 1, 2017, 12:06:29 PM EDT, wrote:
Rich Beckler,
Ken Adams,
Do you remember when I'd asked you what your daughters did for a living? Especially last night Mr.
Beckler, as most Friday nights, no?
Yes, they are the new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell; for you Richard Beckler, this originated from
my being a former Stone Ridge classmate of his elder daughter Katie Beckler, and because he was
on the Board of Stone Ridge during this period in time when my every family, friend, acquaintance
and association was being contacted, bribed in one form or another, and turned against me (see
below); as for Ken Adams, it stemmed from my having contacted him for representation in my 2011-
filed case against IBM also during this period of time when my every communication were being
tracked.
You both are interesting; you let us see what's to become of the Scalia 35 (see below; at bottom,
Ghislaine Maxwell's Jeffrey Epstein in context.)
We start from this following precept: (the repeating 9/11s)
1. "Toward a New World Order" speech by Pres. George H.W. Bush — 9/11 (1990)
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 015002
2. WTC Attack — 9/11 (2001)
3. BENGHAZI Attack — 9/11 (2012)
But you have to remember that H. W. Bush was planted:
AUTHOR PETER DALE SCOTT: Sometimes you have little deep events that most people don't even
notice. One of those would be the Halloween Massacre. The older people remember the Saturday
Night Massacre which happened under Nixon. I'm talking about the Halloween Massacre of October
31, 1975, and probably people watching this show have never heard of it.
That was under Ford, and Ford may have condoned it because it was trying to help restore his
popularity. He was going way down in the polls. But it was a very important series of events all on the
same night. The head of the CIA was fired, William Colby, replaced by a relatively unknown man
called George H. W. Bush who then went on to authorize something that Colby had refused to
authorize - the Team B report - the Team B to recalculate the Soviet threat and it was pre-
determined. They were going to find that it was much bigger than the professionals angled like
Raymond [inaudible] that I mentioned.
They said Russia is less of a threat now than it used to be. Well, that was terrible news for the
industrial complex so the Team B came in and said oh, no, no, no, it's much more of a threat than it
used to be, and that's why we got this huge military build-up. It started actually under Carter but we
think of it as the Reagan build-up, and that of course is a major factor in having ended the Soviet
Union because the Soviet Union tried to match it with a weaker economy. And that arms race which
was not about threats but was about fighting economic war, that was an arms race which you could
say that the Soviet Union lost because they couldn't keep it up. Their economy went more and more
downhill because they were deflecting resources away from vital domestic functions. But really I'm
trying to talk here about the Halloween Massacre...
Just the change in the CIA was a major historical event but it wasn't very visible. The second thing
that happened was they fired Jim Schlesinger as Secretary of Defense... It was being done by
[President Ford's] Chief of Staff and his assistant who are two names barely known then but quite
famous since. Chief of staff was Donald Rumsfeld and the assistant was Dick Cheney. And that was
the first real intrusion of the Rumsfeld-Cheney team into American politics. And they became the real
heart of what I consider the Deep State in the 1980s when they were planning for Continuity of
Government which was a plan for emergency rules like warrantless surveillance and warrantless
detention and the militarization of homeland security. All those things were planned all through the
'80s - COG planning by Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. Even when Rumsfeld wasn't in the
government, he was authorized by Reagan to do this planning.
And why is that important to our history? Because in 2001, these two men were now in the
government - Vice President and Secretary of Defense - the two top people in Washington on
September the 11th, 2001 when Bush was down in Florida - George W. Bush - and what did they do
on that day? They implemented the plans they had been planning for 20 years. Another major event
in American history but it's not usually told that way.
We implemented - it's in the 9/11 Commission Report that COG plans were implemented on that day.
This is a huge change in our country. We now have an ARMY command, NORTHCOM, to take
charge of America - North America, the way SOUTHCOM is in charge of South America and
CENTCOM is in charge of Central Asia.
This used to be illegal... We had the posse comitatus acts which said, yes, if there's a real emergency
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 015003
you could call up the ARMY to deal with the emergency, but you cannot do it on a permanent basis
but we now do do it on a permanent basis. We haven't even bothered to repeal the posse comitatus.
We are in a state of emergency that was declared on September the 14th, 2001. And it's still
enforced. It has to be renewed every year. Obama did it every year just as George Bush renewed it
every year.
What are the roots of this? Well there are the legitimate roots that go back to fear of an atomic
decapitation of the government back in the Truman era, so legitimate COG planning goes back to
Truman and Eisenhower, but the illegitimate use of COG to deal with any emergnecy you like, that
goes to the Reagan administration and it really goes back to the [Halloween] Massacre where
Rumsfeld and Cheney put their thumbprint on American politics for the first time.
-- interview of Peter Dale Scott, @ min. 32:00,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNqDAYWYFuQ&t=2433s
This all suggests that the start of the 9/11 agenda pre-dated him as well. I see now that there was a
seemingly relevant 1990 event as well. "On September 11, 1970 -- a date that only took on haunting
overtones with the attacks on New York and Washington in 2001 -- Nixon became the first U.S.
president to try to protect air travelers from extremists who sensed gaping vulnerabilities in security
for commercial airliners, issuing a statement listing a string of measures including the introduction of
100 air marshals on U.S. planes. "Most countries, including the United States, found effective means
of dealing with piracy on the high seas a century and a half ago," Nixon said. "We can -- and we will --
deal effectively with piracy in the skies today."
The President had been jolted into action by the simultaneous hijackings of planes in Europe headed
to the United States. Jets belonging to TWA, Pan Am and Swissair were seized by the Popular Front
for the Liberation of Palestine. The group also attempted to hijack a jet over London belonging to the
Israeli airline El Al but was thwarted by security guards on board.
The Pan Am seizure ended quickly, but the passengers on the TWA and Swissair jets were diverted
to a British air base in Jordan and the drama only ended after days of tense diplomacy, when the
hostages were all released in a deal in which the Swiss, German, British and Israeli governments let
Palestinian prisoners go." (http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/27/politics/terrorism-1970s-richard-
nixon/index.html)
This 9/11 response sounds quite normal of course. But fast forward and the two secret service
individuals chosen for an April 2001 interview by a PWC staff member on behalf of what becomthe
IBM Center for the Business of Government were (1) Steve Colo who happened to be the head of the
division at SAIC that falsely labeled me a threat and added my name to some sort of Do Not Admit list
at the end of a 5 month temp assignment in 2005 into early 2006. The consequence of the SAIC
designation for me was the following:
(I write) "The SAIC designation took advantage of a devilish stratagem in which as a national security
employee (having filed out a SF-86 form, governed actually by the GSA -
https://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/download/116390 - for government clearance) working a designated
contract in a classified facility, being designated a disturbance/dissident/threat to operations, makes
one, in turn, a threat to national security - with all the surveillance/targeting that enables." In essence I
was made an enemy of the State and was tracked, my family and friends turned, my opportunities
seized to include the opportunity to rear family as demonstrated especially in the 2007 sabotage of
my third trimester pregnancy and then the targeting and eventual capture of children I used to babysit
- in 2011, they were predominantly tweens - to be used for sexual blackmail and other forms of
leverage. The reason for the use of children in this barbaric way was to expend "ops" that were
already in effect and had been used to control many of the politicians that have been allowed to rise
to the top (see info on the Franklin Scandal for example), and similarly according to the laws of
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 015004
compromise, the following which has been recently developing into highly coordinated murder "ops":
(I write) "The progress that was made from the absorbing of my (small) network (and this through
sources and methods - money and other pleasureful compensations given to those willing to
participate in and/or coordinate violence against me and my loved ones to include children leading
only to now their enabled targeting and the absorbing of whatever may be their networks - well, you
see below (and this only the very tip of the iceberg) how many people they've been able to engulf and
what advances have been made by the quite elaborate criminal class employing these tactics; and
one also begins to better understand the events surrounding Justice Scalia's passing and what's to
come for the 35 guests in Scalia's private party. As for Scalia's passing, it was decidedly suspicious
as noted by William Ritchie: (The Washington Post prints) "As a former homicide commander, I am
stunned that no autopsy was ordered for Justice Scalia," William 0. Ritchie, former head of criminal
investigations for D.C. police, wrote in a post on Facebook on Sunday... Ritchie also raised questions
about the marshals' actions: "How can the Marshal say, without a thorough post mortem, that he was
not injected with an illegal substance that would simulate a heart attack... Did the US Marshal check
for petechial hemorrhage in his eyes or under his lips that would have suggested suffocation? Did the
US Marshal smell his breath for any unusual odor that might suggest poisoning? My gut tells me
there is something fishy going on in Texas."
As for SAIC, the following also pertains:
(I write) "If you first see SAIC as what's called a systems integrator (author Tim Shorrock's phrase),
and also the formerly married Bud and Sue Horton and their two grown sons Matthew Horton and
Ben Lanier as aids of an implementation, you can better see the bigger picture:
(1) Sue Horton left IBM in early 2007-ish for an executive position at Tetra Tech which soon entered
into joint venture with SAIC (Sue's employer prior to IBM, btw) on an enormous (billion dollar) 2011
Hillary Clinton State Department award (http://www.prnewswire.com/.../saic-tetra-tech-joint-venture-
a. .);
(2) that Bud Horton left IBM in early 2009-ish for an executive position at Accenture which soon
thereafter entered into joint venture with SAIC spin-off Leidos, and Cerner, on an enormous (billion
dollar) 2015 DoD award (http://www.healthcareitnews.com/.../dod-names-ehr-contract-wi...);
(3) that the Sue Horton contract was used to grow and fortify the Afghan heroin trade (as well as
corrupt law enforcement) although the stated intention was of course the opposite... ("[SAIC and
Tetra Tech's] joint venture, Integrated Justice Systems International, LLC (USD, has been awarded a
contract to provide worldwide civilian police and criminal justice assistance to the U.S. Department of
State's Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL)... [specifically} to provide
INL with program management, criminal justice, and life and mission support to countries emerging
from conflict or otherwise facing instability challenges. Under this new contract, IJSI will provide
technical assistance, training, logistics and infrastructure services to support the Department of
State's efforts to strengthen criminal justice systems in select partner countries.")... yet, just months
shy of contract end, the NY Times reported: "Tasked With Combating Opium, Afghan Officials Profit
From It:" "Penetrating Every Stage of Afghan Opium Chain, Taliban become a Cartel:" and "Corrupt
Combatants Fight for Control of Lucrative Afghan Drug Trade:" see also here an overview of the
growth of Afghan opium production from the start of the US occupation (2001) to the present, and
especially from contract start (2011) to end (2016): http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-spoils-of-war-
afghanist.../91;
(4) and that the award Bud Horton helped secure just as Sue's contract was coming to an end was
not only born from what looks like Franklin Scandal compromises, but it is this contract that seems
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 015005
intent on implementing bioterrorism as the new form of explosive terrorism."
(Note that both members of this family were awarded BILLION dollar contracts; that's quite
exceptional, no?)
As for terrorism as an US industry, it's hardly better seen than through the following which is
information of course we all know:
We note that in-between Bush #41's 9/11/1990 speech(with Dick Cheney as his Secretary of
Defense) and the 9/11/2001 attack on the WTC were little more than Clinton's 8 years in the White
House. We look also to The American Deep State by Peter Dale Scott for evidence of ties between
the actions of the Clinton administration and (1) the 1993 attack on the WTC and (2) the 1998 attack
on the US embassy in Nairobi, Kenya which demonstrate that the Clinton administration in no
uncertain terms sponsored terrorism:
(Writes Scott) "The homicidal crime suggested by Fenton's meticulous research is one both difficult
and painful to contemplate. It has to be considered in the light of the earlier instances of protection we
have surveyed:
1. the protection given to Salameh and Abouhalima in the 1990 Kahane murder, leaving them free to
participate in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing;
2. the failure for two or three years to process Ali Mohamed's documents seized in 1990, which could
have prevented the 1993 World Trade Center bombing;
3. the release of Ali Mohamed from Royal Canadian Mounted Police detention in 1993, leaving him
free to participate in the 1998 Nairobi Embassy bombing;
4. the treatment of Ali Mohamed as an "unindicted coconspirator" in the 1993 WTC bombing case
and Landmarks case, leaving him free to participate in the 1998 Nairobi Embassy bombing.
(pp. 76-77, The American Deep State)
Scott had earlier examined these attacks in especial connection to the September 11, 2001 attack on
the WTC:
(Writes Scott) "For indeed it is certain that on various occasions U.S. agencies have intervened,
letting al-Qaeda terrorists proceed with their plots. This alarming statement will be dismissed by some
as "conspiracy theory." Yet in this chapter, I will show that this claim doesn't to arise from theory, but
from facts that are true, even though they have been systemically suppressed or under-reported in
the American mainstream media. I am describing a phenomenon that occurred not just once, but
repeatedly, almost predictably. We shall see that, among the al-Qaeda terrorists who were first
protected and then continued their activities were the following:
1. Ali Mohamed, identified in the 9/11 Commission Report as the leader of the 1998 Nairobi Embassy
bombing;
2. Mohammed Jamal Khalife, Osama bin Laden's close friend and, while in the Philippines, financier
of both Ramzi Yousef (principal architect of the first World Trade Center [WTC] attack) and his uncle
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed;
3. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, identified in the 9/11 Commission Report as "the principal architect of
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 015006
the 9/11 attacks";
4. Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi, two of the alleged 9/11 hijackers, whose presence in the
United States was concealed from the FBI by CIA officers for months before 9/11.
It might sound from these citations that the 9/11 Commission marked a new stage in the U.S.
treatment of these terrorists, and that the report now exposed those terrorists who in the past had
been protected. On the contrary, a principal purpose of my chapter is to show that
1. one purpose of protecting these individuals had been to protect a valued intelligence connection
(the "al-Qaeda connection," if you will);
2. one major intention of the 9/11 Commission Report was to continue protecting this connection;
3. those on the 9/11 Commission staff who were charged with this protection included at least one
commission member (Jamie Gorelick), one staff member (Dietrich Snell), and one important witness
(Patrick Fitzgerald) who earlier had figured among the terrorists' protectors.
In the course of writing this chapter [Scott continues], I came to another disturbing conclusion I had
not anticipated. This is that a central feature of the protection has been to defend the 9/11
Commission's false picture of al-Qaeda as an example of non-state terrorism, ignoring not just the
CIA but also the royal families of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. In reality, as I shall show, royal family
protection from Qatar and Saudi Arabia (concealed by the 9/11 Commission) was repeatedly given to
key figures like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged "principal architect of the 9/11 attacks." The
establishment claims that the wars fought by America in Asia since 9/11 have been part of a global
"war on terror." But this "war on terror" has been fought in alliance with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and
Pakistan - precisely the principal political and financial backers of the al-Qaedist networks the United
States has supposedly been fighting. Meanwhile the most authentic opponents in the region of these
Sunni al-Qaedists - the governments of Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Iran - have found themselves
overthrown (in the case of Iraq and Libya), subverted with U.S. support (in the case of Syria), or
sanctioned and threatened as part of an "axis of evil" (in the case of Iran). We should not forget that,
just one day after 9/11, "Rumsfeld was talking about broadening the objectives of our response and
'getting Iraq."
(pp. 44-45, The American Deep State)
Clinton's daughter is now poised to work global health initiatives which I would suggest is little more
than a cover for on-going terrorism "ops".
To return to Steve Colo - in the interview he speaks of a partnership between the Secret Service, the
FBI, and South Carolina's SLED (State Law Enforcement Division) to open a Computer Crime Center.
Bud Horton (mentioned above) (long-affiliated with IT Security; his title at Accenture was Chief
technology officer of it's cyber security practice) happened to have just moved to South Carolina from
Loudoun County after being implicated in a continuing child sex scandal (see details below). Further,
cyber-crime just so happens to be another of the arenas in which our Intelligence Community
coordinates with the Russians: "The US cooperates with the FSB and Russia's interior ministry on
counter-terrorism, organized crime, bio-terrorism, and cyber-crime." -- p. 243, Expelled: A Journalist's
Descent into the Russian Mafia State, by Luke Harding) Most would interpret this quote to suggest
that the nations work together to prevent these various threats. The reality is more the opposite; trust
me when I say that the US doesn't work "ops" alone - the 2005 London Bombings is one notable
example of a instance in which the US coordinated with also British intelligence in the perpetration of
an attack.) I just tweeted this morning actually the following in regards to US coordinations with the
Russians: "One must know a renowned Rus mafiaso was granted entry
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vyacheslay_lvankov#Moving_to_the_United_States ... be4 the real story
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 015007
of today's US-Rus relations is slowly known" in response to the following comment @turndeaux:
Peter Dale Scott, who writes about the Deep State, says Russia issue is "a bona fide security issue,
not a diversion".
About Bud Horton and the Loudoun County matter - in attempts to make a long story short, the
following email chain:
On Monday, June 26, 2017 10:57 AM,
Sheriff Chapman,
Loudoun Count, VA
wrote:
Did you ever consider that Loudoun was a target? That your community was induced to walk it's own
children down the plank as compensation for what Loudoun had done to the young Dima Yakovlev?
Because now child exploitation is deeply embedded within your community with your own people
(your own police, your own prosecutors, your own public defenders and private attorneys) protecting
this very system that will be used to take the futures of your Loudoun children (see more of the details
below). Is it possible that that's how this happened, and you saw it not unfolding before your eyes? Or
was it simply money and just another good enough justification?
Forwarded Message
On Monday, June 26, 2017 10:24 AM,
Changeis,
wrote:
You reported in May of 2014 that you hired Bob Richel formerly of the DEA as Vice President of
Corporate Development. In an April 2014 interview by the Loudoun County Police (those in the mouth
of the lion but not quite aware of it yet but to have foreseen the ways in which the 2008 death of the
Russian born 21 month-old Dima Yakovlev (renamed Chase Harrison by his Purcellville, VA adoptive
parents) would have been used as "justification" for a (quite profitable) counter-offensive... ) of Henry
"Bud" Horton (characterized by Loudoun County as a "victim" of the recent "False statement to Law
Enforcement Officer (LEO)" of him sexually exploiting the 15 year-old Anjulee Gunther), Henry "Bud"
Horton named Bob Rachel as one of the DEA guys he used to work with. This takes on unusual
significance in light of the below, no?
(How lovely, by the way, this following information and the ways in which it helps us understand many
of the hidden influences: "Halliburton is also involved with the Russian mob. They're got sort of two
things going on. One is oil and the other is drug trafficking. Halliburton is a story all by itself." (says
Stan Goff, http://narconews.com/goffmccormick1.html))
On Saturday, June 24, 2017 2:43 PM, wrote:
Mr. Satz,
State's Attorney, Broward County, Fl
I'm forwarding the below information as it pertains to Mrs. Lesley Simms and more importantly the
ones with whom she continues to coordinate.
As you may know, she was once close with an individual named Matthew Horton with whom she
attended George Mason University, and through Matthew, Ms. Simms became well-acquainted with
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 015008
Matthew's parents Henry "Bud" Horton and Sue Popovich Horton who helped secure her a position at
IBM upon her graduation from GMU. Both of these latter individuals (Bud and Sue Horton) were
involved in the 2007 murder of my son, and they in collusion with their son Matthew continue in the
exploitation of children Anjulee and Xian Gunther. The powers that be intend now for these children to
(continue to) follow in the footsteps of Ms. Simms, and to that end, I would advise that you become
acquainted with (1) the ways in which Ms. Simms subsidized her law school education and off course
(2) her current and related endeavors especially as they relate to drug trafficking and terror financing
(see below email to Mr. Martin of the St. Augustine Record).
On Friday, June 23, 2017 8:36 AM, wrote:
Mr. Martin,
St. Augustine Record
Quite an interesting article about the litigation between Deputy Banks and Rusty Rogers (see:
Deputy Banks' attorney claims FDLE agent's credibility 'destroyed') It must also be explored, of
course, that Officers Rodgers was once well respected for his investigation and exposure of a terrorist
financing network that permeated the sunny state of Florida - (the NY Times reports) "Agent Rodgers
joined the state's elite investigative unit, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, where he
quickly earned agent-of-the-year honors — and a meeting with the governor — for helping dismantle
a terrorist financing network that stretched from Florida to the Middle East" - and that terrorism is very
much a well-protected U.S. industry (see below).
God forbid some poor should get away with disrupting the delicate state of secreted operations; as
you yourself report, "As written in [Plaintiff Banks] motion: "Defendant Rodgers' false, misleading and
inconsistent testimony throughout the discovery process is so pervasive and extreme, and involves
so many material issues, it has destroyed Defendant's credibility on all issues..." And here we see the
"whole-of-government" attempts to restore balance.
As for the second Secret Service agent interviewed by the IBM Center for the Business of
Government, his name is Dana Brown. He just so happened to have filled out his career with the
Federal Air Marshall Service (October 2003-August 2008 as Director/Chief of Staff) followed by the
TSA (March 2006-January 2009 as Asst. Administrator-Law Enforcement/Integrity Officer) states his
Linked In profile. That he worked his way around to that which was largely put in place by the 1970
9/11 mini-event seems to me rather significant although I don't see all the details yet. I also don't yet
see exactly who it was that birthed this lengthy 9/11 initiative we're suffering. It seems clear, however,
that it was birthed prior to 1970.
The initiative has adjusted in some ways over time, but homage to 9/11 remains strong. Certain of the
people deeply involved in these manipulations thought it was kismet that an individual well-suited to
head the newly ordained Department of Homeland Security (that as we all know was the result of
legislation rushed through Congress in the aftermath of the 9/11 (2001) attack) was born on the
magical September 11th (this is Jeh Johnson); similarly, it is again being deemed a sign that the new
Director of the National Science Foundation (NSF) (chosen and positioned as she was) is first-named
France (last name Cordova) and that this name so perfectly relates to US intentions to use the NSF
to forward "ops" that will solidify a US-France working relationship in the same way the 2005 London
Bombings helped solidify the US-British working relationship. These France going-ons are in higher
gear (I've noticed) since Macron was elected but it was prepped for long ago. I was working for IBM
under IBM project manager Cathie Skoog at the NSF when my third trimester pregnancy was
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 015009
sabotaged. The story of this sabotage and what followed is (briefly) this:
I've long-alleged that John and Avery Gunther (whose children I used to babysit) agreed to a quid pro
quo exchange of financial compensation for help destroying my credibility on behalf of IBM against
whom I'd filed a 2010 EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) charge and a subsequent
May 2011 civil suit.
Per the May 11, 2011 Complaint, McGuire v. John and Avery Gunther:
3. On April 6, 2011 Mr. and Mrs Gunther, with uncontrolled greed and total disregard for the rights
and feelings of Ms. Nadine McGuire as well as those of their children, AFG and XWG, maliciously
and with ill-intent, wrongfully completed and executed a Complaint and Motion for Preliminary
Injunction requesting formal protection against Ms. Nadine McGuire.
4. Over the course of the previous few months, Mr. and Mrs. Gunther, colluding with persons against
whom Ms. Nadine McGuire is currently furthering litigation, including but not limited to plaintiff's
mother, Pauline Scala McGuire, and from whom they received and/or have been promised to receive
monetary incentives, hid their relationships with said individuals, further lied about having those
relationships in direct conversation with Ms. Nadine McGuire and Court testimony on May 4, 2011,
and wrongfully completed and executed a Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction against
Ms. Nadine McGuire in cooperation and collaboration with said persons, resulting in the issuance of a
Temporary Restraining Order against Ms. Nadine McGuire issued on April 6, 2011.
- Initial Complaint, 5/11/11, McGuire v. John and Avery Gunther, Case No.:2011 CA 003703 B, DC
Superior Court, Judge Gregory Jackson presiding
In regards to the suit against IBM (McGuire v. IBM, 1:11CV528, US District Court of Virginia), the only
suit in which Pauline Scala McGuire was listed as a defendant, the most important claim was one of
"assault" that led to the 2007 death of my son. Per the filing:
Plaintiff, Grace Nadine McGuire, realleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-65 hereof as if fully set
forth within and further alleges:
66. Defendant Palmisano's conduct in ascertaining the drug that was used on the plaintiff to end her
pregnancy and take the life of her child on April 22, 2007, constitutes an intentional touching of the
plaintiff by defendant Palmisano, and was undertaken deliberately and with actual malice towards the
plaintiff and her unborn child.
67. Defendant Skoog, Susan Horton and Scala's conduct in coordinating the circumstances, creating
physical proximity and the administering of the drug to the plaintiff that ended her pregnancy and took
the life of her child on April 22, 2007 constituted an intentional touching of the plaintiff by said
defendants, and was undertaken deliberately and with actual malice towards the plaintiff and her
unborn child.
... 69. As the direct and proximate result of defendant Palmisano, Skoog, Susan Horton, and Scala's
conduct, the plaintiff suffered a severe placental abruption, which terminated her pregnancy and
ended the life of her unborn child, causing the plaintiff to suffer damages including but not limited to
the loss of her child, loss of affection, grief, sorrow, extreme mental torment and emotional distress.
- Initial Complaint, filed 5/16/11, McGuire v. IBM, et al, Case No.: 1:11CV528, US District Court of
Virginia - Eastern Division, Alexandria, Judge Leonie Brinkema presiding
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 015010
This is to say that John and Avery Gunther helped IBM defend against an allegation of murder, and in
this way they are accomplices to a cover-up. This is also to say that the characterization provided by
John and Avery Gunther in their April 2011 Superior Court filing for a Protection Order against me
and their admissions in this filing of having provided derogatory information to various persons and/or
entities in the DC area to include school administrators, psychologists, and law enforcement, were
more to harm me, especially in my chances to hold IBM accountable, than to protect either
themselves or children Anjulee and Xian Gunther.
I also long-allege that the relationship that developed from this initial quid pro quo led to John and
Avery Gunther being similarly compensated for what turned into the sexual exploitation of their two
daughters. For more on child sexual exploitation for the sake of personal and professional leverage,
see especially the following:
Nick Bryant I The Franklin Scandal & The Elite's Pedophilia Cover Up,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68gyGGPjmOo&t=978s
That the NSF won't acknowledge the abuse, and won't respond even to my FOIA requests, and
otherwise has gone to extents to protect Cathie Skoog and her co-conspirators at IBM and otherwise
is all that was needed to have adequately turned the organization towards the interests of the Deep
State. Now it is simply a matter of the Deep State continuing to put the NSF to use.
*
*
Jeffrey Epstein in context:
(As sent to the Wash Post)
I send you this in response to the recent column entitled Believe in the Process by Kenneth Starr.
Perhaps rethink any public affiliation with Ken Starr; although his demeanor on paper is undoubtably
consoling, it is also a bit intoxifying when it would be best now if we keep our wits about us, no?
I say this from the following perspective - Ken Starr of the Starr Report, attorney for (1) Erik Prince of
Blackwater and (2) convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein in context:
The Starr Report buried behind salacious detail of the Lewinsky affair almost nothing of Whitewater,
Travelgate, or otherwise what many consider the murder of Vince Foster (Foster, albeit the subject of
a different investigation was also under the purview of attorney Starr and formal investigation of the
results of Starr's investigation were drowned out by the details of the Lewinsky affair.) This is a bit
strange considering the Lewinsky affair was a moral failing and not an actionable criminal one as
would have been the others had any proof surfaced.
Starr later defended Blackwater against wrongful deaths suit initiated by the families of the 2004
Fallujah Ambush victims - "In October 2006, Blackwater hired one of the nation's heaviest-hitting
lawyers to represent it - Kenneth Starr, the independent counsel in the 1999 impeachment of
President Bill Clinton over the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal... Starr and his colleagues argued that
Blackwater was "constitutionally immune" from such lawsuits and said that if the Fallujah case were
allowed to proceed, "Blackwater will suffer irreparable harm." In the eighteen-page petition to the
Supreme Court, Blackwater argued that there are no other such lawsuits against private
military/security companies in state courts "because the comprehensive regulatory scheme enacted
by Congress and the President grant military contractors like Blackwater immunity from state-court
litigation." (pp. 234-235, Blackwater). (Author Ken Davis writes) "The four men had spent the night
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 015011
before they set off at marine base Camp Fallujah. But the men kept their distance from the
leathernecks. Had they spoken to the marines, the Blackwater team might have learned that the
Americans were already in the midst of a major offensive meant to assert control over the
increasingly restive city, where elements of the radical Islamist movement and remnants of Saddam's
army were beginning to aggressively strike back. at the American occupation" (p. 306, The Hidden
History of American at War), and perhaps this is the only thing that makes sense of the fact that
"Under the terms of its contract, Blackwater was supposed to supply these convoy security missions
with two SUVs, each carrying three guards per vehicle; a driver, one man riding shotgun, and a third
man in back with a heavy machine gun. Instead, the foursome set out that morning with just two men
per car, each vehicle missing their rear gunner. The SUVs were only outfitted with a steel plate as
extra armor. And the men had not been given maps." (p. 305).
Starr went on to defend Jeffrey Epstein abasing allegations of child sex trafficking - "Along with a
dream team of attorneys that included Gerald Lefcourt, Roy Black, and Ken Starr, [Alan Dershowitz]
was successful in getting federal investigators not to charge Epstein with moving his victims across
state lines and other associated crimes. The federal non-prosecution agreement Epstein's legal team
negotiated with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida immunized all named and
unnamed "potential co-conspirators" in Epstein's child trafficking network, which includes those who
allegedly procured minors for Epstein and also any powerbrokers who may have molested them" (-
http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-ped...). Otherwise, Epstein's eventual 18
month sentence by the state of Florida was exceptionally light under the circumstances to include the
number of victims who came forward with testimony. This is best understood in the context of children
being used as a means to government-sponsored sexual blackmail and other forms of leverage.
See here Erik Prince in greater context: (the similarities between him and once (secretly) favored
child Bin Laden)
The coordinations among global intelligence to make rather than eliminate terror as seen thru
"assets" bin Laden (as M. Noriega before him) & Erik Prince:
About BL: "Some CIA officers will later say that [BL] serves as a semi-official liaison between the GIP
[Saudi intell and warlords like Sayyaf."
(www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=ahmed_badeeb_1)
About EP: "Handcuffed by politics, the CIA had not been able to cultivate relationships with the key
but messy leaders. Fortunately, Blackwater had no such political restrictions." (p. 54, Civilian Warriors
by E. Prince)
We see also:
About BL: "Bin Laden established camps inside Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in Pakistan and trained
volunteers from across the Muslim world to fight against the Soviet-backed regime, the Democratic
Republic of Afghanistan" (Wikipedia)
About EP: "In his autobiography, he states that during the Yugoslav Wars in the early 1990s, he
realized the need for private training facilities for special operations... Prince moved to Virginia Beach
and personally financed the formation of Blackwater Worldwide in 1997. He bought 6,000 acres (24
km2) of the Great Dismal Swamp of North Carolina and set up a school for special operations"
(Wikipedia)
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 015012
Erik Prince is (becoming) no less an Amer. intelligence success story than bin Laden (in support of
Terrorism as Geostrategy & a New World Order - see below). In short: (we note the repeating 9/11s,
every 11 years): "Toward a NWO" speech by Bush #41 - Sept. 11 ('90); The WTC - Sept. 11 ('01);
Benghazi - Sept. 11 ('12). (There is rhy. & reason also 2 the rise of ISIS.)
***
About training camps:
I watched so to speak the creating of little torture pockets around the world as justified by Obama's
desire to close Gitmo. The White House reports (2/23/16): "We'll continue to securely and responsibly
transfer to other countries the 35 detainees already approved for transfer. This process involves
extensive and careful coordination across our federal government to ensure that our national security
interests are met when an individual is transferred to another country. We insist, for example, that
foreign countries institute strong security measures." But are these not just the seeds of new training
camps (growing concentrated and lauded violent temperaments) & was that not someone's exact
intent?
In real-time (and as perpetrated on captured children):
3/19/14, sent to the now defunct FB page of D. Cheney:
Dick Cheney,
I wonder if it's possible that there is coordination with other countries concerning enhanced
interrogation techniques, in the form of training perhaps?
Specifically, here in the United States, my sense is that there may be the use of vulnerable
populations, with the intension to gain favor with and/or intimidate others, especially members of the
international community.
And:
On Saturday, June 21, 2014 6:37 AM,
To:
Deputy Lyddy,
wrote:
Her energy is very weak. She is physically exhausted, VERY sleep deprived, and HUNGRY.
[These were continuing experimentations in reversed-engineered SERE; the agreed upon
techniques, taken from various regions of the world to be distributed to the various regions of the
world, had to be deemed not torture and this is where organizations like the APA stepped in, then
(during the Bush administration), and afterwards. See here for example: "And I think, you know,
what's really important in the debate going forward among psychologists is the extent to which
psychologists loaned their names and loaned their credentials and their Ph.D.s to this kind of activity
and essentially were used by the Bush administration to provide a kind of "get out of jail free" card for
the people who were, you know, doing these interrogations, because the logic, which I think Mark had
mentioned, is, you know, this circular logic. So long as there are trained psychologists from
the SERE program who are on site at these interrogations who are saying that these detainees can
withstand this treatment, are not being harmed psychologically, then it's not torture. So, you know,
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 015013
you've got this sort of [inaudible] tortured — tortured logic, which is the phrase that has come up, but
it's this sort of self-justifying loop in which professionals are loaning their credentials to this kind of
activity. And you see the same thing in the Office of Legal Counsel, where you have, you know,
lawyers loaning their credentials to approving what are clear violations of the Geneva Conventions."
(https://www.democracynow.ord/2009/4/21/the story of mitchell lessen associates)]
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 015014