File 014525
Bank of America Investment Outlook: The Year Ahead - A World of Change (File 014525)
Email from Paul V Morris containing Bank of America Global Wealth and Investment Management's market analysis and outlook for 2017, discussing economic trends, investment strategy, and the impact of unexpected political and market events.
Summary
This document is a Bank of America investment outlook report sent by Paul V Morris to discuss market conditions and investment strategy for 2017. The report analyzes 2016 as "The Year of The Unlikely," covering unexpected events including Brexit, oil price collapse, negative interest rates, and Donald Trump's presidential election victory. Chief Investment Officer Christopher Hyzy explains why the current business cycle can continue despite being in its ninth year, introducing the concept of "animal spirits" as a catalyst for breaking from secular stagnation into fiscal reflation, while advising on portfolio positioning for the new era ahead.
From: Morris, Paul VSent: 1/5/2017 3:31:54 PMTo: Morris, Paul VCC: Lehane, Sean TSubject: The Year Ahead: A World of Change (Short Version Below For Convenience)Attachments: image001.jpg; image003.jpg; image004.jpg; image005.png; image006.jpgThe Year Ahead: A World of ChangeA continued rise in equities. Renewed investor confidence. Bond markets underpressure. Our Chief Investment Office explores the risks and opportunities ofthese and other trends shaping the year ahead.AS WELOOKBACK ON2016, onecouldcharacterizeit as TheYear of TheUnlikely. It began with deep worries regarding China's growth path, a second wave of collapsingoil prices, a Federal Reserve (Fed) hiking into deflationary headwinds, the impact of negativeinterest rates in Europe and Japan, concerns over a potential U.S. recession, lower-quality corporateHOUSE OVERSIGHT 014525high yield problems, and U.S. consumers who might never spend their savings at the pump. Allthese worries hit at once in January and February, prompting the S&P 500 to fall over 10% from its2015 closing level of 2043. The year, at that point, appeared bleak.Our view was to maintain a balanced and diversified position throughout the downturn, particularlyfor the long haul, due to our belief that the major concerns, although understandable, were simplynot going to fully develop and asset prices would begin to track fundamentals more effectivelythrough the remainder of the year. The potential for risk assets to climb higher was there but acatalyst was needed. For our full view on the year ahead, please read our December 2016 MonthlyLetter.Exhibit 1: Mid-Cycle Slowdown Ended In Early 2016,When Oil and Dollar Stabilized)120Spot 01 Price: West Texas Incernwdlate_.(6-Alowth Moving erage. Left Scale!e 60— .40 _____Rea Broad Trade-Weighted EachawrValue of theuss20 46-14ontre Moving Average Right SCaleIlly0eSiouidown..................................................................10306 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16Source: EINCME; FRB/Haver Anatytics. Data as of December 5, 2016.96928884Past performance is no guarantee offuture results.Our core belief was centered on healthy consumers who would indeed pick up their spending fromsavings at the pump and become more confident as job growth continued and real incomesincreased. We also believed U.S. financial conditions and the economic backdrop would improve inthe second half of the year as the pressure from the strong dollar subsided and the deflationaryeffects of the collapse in oil prices began to fade. In other words, we were witnessing evidence thatthe mid-cycle slowdown that had hurt economic growth and corporate earnings was ending. [SeeExhibit 1] Based on this core belief, the "grind it out" year for risk assets would be back on track,the business cycle would extend into 2017, bond yields would slowly shift higher, and equitymarkets had the potential to head toward previous highs.A series of unexpected outcomesAt this point, we did not characterize 2016 as The Year of the Unlikely. However, if you considerspecific events throughout the year in finance and sports, it is easy to see that now. We alreadymentioned the second plunge in oil prices to the mid-$20s per barrel to start the year, and bondmarkets in some areas of the world actually had negative yields—meaning the lender paid theentity issuing the bonds to take their money! This was unlikely. How about Brexit vote in GreatBritain? Unlikely. In sports, Villanova University winning the national championship in men'scollege basketball (Nova's first championship since 1985), Leicester—the English football club—HOUSE OVERSIGHT 014526winning the Premier League (before this season began, British bookmakers listed them as a 5,000-to-1 shot to emerge as the champion), the Cleveland Cavaliers' first ever National BasketballAssociation championship and, of course, the Chicago Cubs winning the World Series for the firsttime since 1908! All unlikely. But they happened.Last but not least, in our own political backyard, we witnessed Donald Trump's victory in the U.S.presidential election last month. Also unlikely. We all know markets do not like uncertainty.However, sentiment can shift quickly if fundamentals are not negatively affected, and what waspreviously determined to be "unlikely" turns to enthusiasm as to what could be."We expect business, consumer and investor confidence to continue to headhigher well into 2017, with most of the newly expected growth to come in 2018,which should underpin equities for most of the year."CHRISTOPHER HYZYCHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, BANK OF AMERICA GLOBAL WEALTH AND INVESTMENT MANAGEMENTWhy this expansion can continueBusiness cycles typically last between five and seven years before fundamentals deteriorate,usually due to a policy error of some sort. This can produce a recession and/or a bear market, whichtend to correct the excesses that have been built up and kick-start a new cycle. Bull markets andcycles do not die of old age—there needs to be a fundamental catalyst that emerges and pushes thetrends back the other way.We are entering our ninth year in the current business cycle, despite all of the complexities andconcerns that have come and gone since the financial crisis.. In fact, this cycle could have extendedanother few years along the same path, given the secular stagnation that prevailed. This era neededultra-accommodative central bank monetary policy just to keep things stable and plodding alongthis far into the cycle. It also needed corporations willing to manage their earnings to the penny in abelow trend growth world that offered little pricing power. And finally, this cycle needed U.S. andemerging market consumers to continue to switch from deleveraging to spending as their balancesheets and incomes improved.A return of "animal spirits"This dynamic could have continued for a bit, but monetary policy has become tired. Negativeinterest rates have become a headwind, not a tailwind, in our view. And, just like sports fans,investors need a catalyst to break from the past. Visible positive catalysts tend to turn intoimproved sentiment and confidence. Through the years, economists have called this "animalspirits."Animal spirits begin as hope, turn into enthusiasm, and ultimately need visible action to keep thespirited momentum going. After all, economics is a behavioral science. It is our view that we arebreaking from the era of secular stagnation and heading into fiscal reflation. This new era is likelyto have its fits and starts and will not be in a straight line. It should also include different stages andspeeds from various economic regions globally. Furthermore, it should contain some "unlikely"outcomes. With any cycle, we will have to take the good (higher nominal growth) with the potentialHOUSE OVERSIGHT 014527bad (higher volatility) and investors will have to reposition portfolios, rebalancing when necessary,in order to take advantage of the new era.Prior to the U.S. presidential election, and even dating back to the summer months when bondyields bottomed, the economy was already beginning to improve. Corporate earnings were pickingup, the consumer was spending at a healthy clip, there were some subtle signs of positive surprisesin European economic activity, and the downturn in emerging markets (and negative earningsrevisions) ceased. We were certainly not waving the celebratory flag on growth, but the economywas getting up off the ground, which is what risk assets, including equities, need sometimes.However, the S&P 500—a major benchmark for U.S. stocks--had lost momentum heading into theelection, as investors worried that the secular stagnation era would continue and that monetarypolicy had lost its effectiveness.Market sentiment changed dramatically during the early morning hours on November 9. Thesurprise victory by Donald Trump caught many investors off-guard. The potential for fiscalstimulus measures, reduced regulation, corporate tax reform and other potential pro-growthinitiatives increased. Animal spirits perked up. Investor positioning was heavily skewed towardlong-duration fixed income, low-volatility equities and high-dividend-paying companies. Theseareas significantly outperformed in the first half of the year but started to lose momentum oncerates bottomed mid-year. However, investor positioning did not change materially at first.Portfolios were still generally overexposed to higher- quality, rate-sensitive investments—otherwise known as "bond proxies."In our Hills Have Eyes strategy report, published on November 16, we outlined the need torebalance portfolios given our belief that we were already transitioning toward the late-cycleexpansion phase and that the new enthusiasm for pro-growth policies would begin to accelerateinvestor flows toward more cyclical investments. Given the high degree of underexposure to late-cycle investments by investors, we believed such a rotation would cause a "melt-up" in equitiestoward new highs over time.Diversification and rebalancing will be keySo, how are we going to manage portfolios in a world undergoing a major market regime shift, onethat is transitioning from the era of secular stagnation to fiscal reflation, and one that still has aconsiderable amount of uncertainty? We are going to become more prescriptive, remain diversifiedand balanced, but with more exposure to pro-growth, pro-cyclical areas. We will also likelyrebalance more often throughout the year as investor rotation gathers momentum during 2017 andinto 2018; and we look to periods of volatility as opportunities to add to areas we favor."Fixed income still represents an important portfolio diversifier___and a volatilitydampener in unforeseen worst-case scenarios."CHRISTOPHER HYZYCHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, BANK OF AMERICA GLOBAL WEALTH AND INVESTMENT MANAGEMENTWe expect business, consumer and investor confidence to continue to head higher well into 2017,with most of the newly expected growth to come in 2018, which should underpin equities for mostof the year. Higher nominal growth, an improved picture for corporate profits and continuedHOUSE OVERSIGHT 014528positive sentiment are the foundation for continued gains in the equity markets and an investorrotation from overexposure to long-dated fixed income into under owned equities.This rotation will need a few periods of confirmation, given the still uncertain broader global macrooutlook, but we expect price-to-earnings multiples to remain elevated, despite higher rates,throughout the year. S&P 500 earnings have a wide range of forecasts due to the potential forsizable tax cuts in 2017. Based on this, the S&P 500 could add extra earnings on top of normalizedgrowth, which is expected to be around 9%. At present, a reasonable range, albeit a wide one, isconsidered to be between $129 and $138 with the potential for further upside. In this scenario,where we get pro-growth policies filtering into a higher earnings number, an S&P 500 bull caselevel of 2700 at the high end is possible.Improving profits and growth should take equities higherFor now, a base case utilizing the five factor framework from BofA Merrill Lynch GlobalResearch, which combines sentiment, valuation and technical, equates to 2300 for the S&P 500 atyear end. The two components that include long-term valuation and 12-month price momentum areindicating that S&P 500 levels between the base and bull case are increasing in probability. Ofcourse, there are a number of scenarios that could unfold that would indicate a wide range ofoutcomes depending on the multiple or earnings number that ultimately develops. In the end, it allcomes down to the path of corporate profits and the visibility on growth, both of which areimproving.Highlights We have moved from a "get paid to wait" core portfolio theme to a more cyclical- and value-oriented theme in multi-asset portfolios • Equities remain attractive versus fixed income on a relative basis.• Within equities. we favor U.S. large caps. U.S. small caps and emerging markets.• Within equities, we favor value over growth and more cyclical assets versus defensives.• Within fixed income. we prefer credit to Treasuries. We would also consider an allocation to Treasury inflation protected securities (TIPS) where appropriate.Portfolio repositioning is likely to continue well into 2017, as developments unfold and the pro-cyclical environment gathers momentum. With growth already heading higher from Q3 2016onward and earnings turning positive, investors have begun increasing cyclicality and exposure tovalue in portfolios at the expense of more defensive sectors and higher-dividend areas withinequities. In addition, we expect a larger shift in emphasis toward small capitalization, which hasalready started, and more domestic-oriented equities due to a slightly stronger dollar, more pro-growth policies and the desire for a hedge against potential retaliatory trade policies from mainHOUSE OVERSIGHT 014529trading partners. This portfolio shift in positioning is happening but, in our view, is in its earlystages.We have moved from a "get paid to wait" core portfolio theme to a more cyclical and value-oriented theme in multi-asset and all-equity portfolios primarily due to increased business andconsumer confidence, which should lead to higher earnings than originally expected.• Therefore, we have raised our exposure to equities versus fixed income to a moderate overweight and our new tacticalasset allocation view is overweight equities versus its strategic benchmark.• We are now further underweight fixed income versus equities, underweight versus its strategic benchmark rather thanneutral, and have lowered cash to neutral from overweight.Within the asset classes, we have made a number of changes consistent with our view from earlierthis year and one that has accelerated post-election.• We are now moderately overweight U.S. small capitalization equities and neutral non-U.S. developed markets.• We maintain our preference for U.S. high-quality large caps and continue to overweight emerging markets.• We continue to favor value over growth and more cyclical areas (such as financials and consumer discretionary) versusdefensives (such as utilities and consumer staples).In fixed income, we have moved from a balanced view to a larger underweight versus the strategicbenchmark.• However, fixed income still represents an important portfolio diversifier___and a volatility dampener in unforeseenworst-case scenarios___and should be viewed primarily as a cash flow producer versus a total return asset, given the expectationsfor higher yields.• In addition, we have lowered Treasuries to a further underweight but maintain our neutral rating on high yield andunderweight on international fixed income.• Municipal bonds have corrected to levels that are becoming attractive again, and we are still favorable on investmentgrade corporate credit.• We maintain our neutral rating on real estate and commodities, but we prefer metals and oil to gold.In addition, the pro-cyclical improvement has started to break down the elevated correlation amongand within asset classes since earlier in 2016. We expect this adjustment to continue in 2017 aseconomic volatility picks up and asset class volatility follows suit. Transitions to late-cycle phasestend to invite a higher level of volatility as inflation rises and central bank policies shift to nudgingshort rates higher.In this environment, alternative investments, namely hedge funds, should outperform industrybenchmarks, in contrast to recent underperformance. For investors able to withstand a higherallocation of illiquid assets in their portfolio, we prefer timberland for its long term-growthprospects and low correlation to financial assets.Paul V. MorrisManaging Director I The Morris GroupPrivate Banking & Investment GroupMerrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Bank of America Tower I One Bryant Park (28) New York, NY 10036r PRIVATE BANKING &!-DPi Lynch INVESTMEN T GROUPHOUSE OVERSIGHT 014530This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that isprivileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available athttp://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete thismessage.HOUSE OVERSIGHT 014531